Thursday, July 8, 2010

Wildlife tourism

Does tourism help or hinder the increase and protection of wildlife? This has become an issue of considerable debate in recent times, particularly after reports of animals in sanctuaries and national parks falling prey to tourist vehicles. The most recent incident is that of a tigress being found dead in the Bandhavgarh Tiger Reserve, after hit by one of the many tourist vehicles that visit the area; the cause of death was later ascertained to be liver rupture.

While it would be simplistic to suggest that blocking tourists will help wildlife thrive, those opposed to such a ban argue that the move will reduce the income of those living in fringe areas, making them easy associates in the poaching network. Plus, the revenue generated from tourism is channeled into conservation efforts. The dwindling income of forest authorities could actually leave corrupt staff to have a field day!

In India, liberating the jungles from any form of human presence is a complicated issue. Indigenous, tribal people have co-existed peacefully with the forest and its animals. With this in mind, conservation efforts can be based on an inclusive model, utilizing the skills and traditional knowledge of the local people, with an aim to reduce man-animal conflict. Tourist inflow into core areas should be regulated, while limiting the visits and making them more expensive can also be looked into.

1 comment:

  1. Continuing with the theme, I would like to know what good does it do to let people know that there are 141 tigers left in India? if it's a question of awareness then, okay thanks. NOW WHAT? WHAT CAN WE DO? we are not poachers or traders etc. This awareness should be directed towards those who are susceptible to the unlawful killing of the beautiful animal. I just can't understand the point of it being aired on every media

    ReplyDelete